LandGazette.co.uk

LandGazette.co.uk

Search

News in brief

FC Wales smooths passage to important woodland

With its fascinating historical features, enchanting scenery and strong links to the end of the last major ice age, i Parkwood on the Gower is a popular tourist location. Forestry Commission Wales has stepped in to ensure a smoother passage into this environmental jewel after the Welsh Government woodland became the victim of its own alluring beauty. The road allowing access to the site of special scientific interest (SSSI) was showing signs of serious wear and tear, with badly pot-holed areas testifying to Parkwood’s popularity.

 
Saffery Champness comment on CAP Reform announcement

Commenting on the announcement on CAP Reform by EU Farm Minister, Dacian Ciolos, Andrew Arnott, a partner of  Saffery Champness Landed Estates & Rural Business Group says: “There was not much in the announcement that had not already been leaked. However, it confirms the intention to distribute subsidies more evenly by way of a cap on payments to farmers at 300,000 euros (£261,240) per year.  A progressive levy, to be applied on all payments exceeding 150,000 euros (£130,620), was also announced as a proposal. Assuming that the proposals will be approved by both the EU parliament and all member states, this will be bad news for many large arable farmers and some medium scale farming businesses, including those in the uplands.It remains to be seen whether the ‘sustainable and inclusive growth’ for European agriculture can really be achieved through these proposals.  I think they could, as they stand, have the opposite effect, acting as a disincentive to invest for farm businesses that are highly-mechanised with lower staffing levels”.

 
Leaked proposals for the reform of CAP entitlements

News has recently been leaked from the European Commission that farmers who claim more than €150,000 from the direct support element of the CAP (Pillar1), will see their entitlement payments progressively capped.  Commenting on the leaked proposals Mike Harrison, a partner of Saffery Champness Landed Estates & Rural Business Group, says: “There is a strongly worded proposal for progressive cuts in the entitlement payments above €150,000 ( £127,000) with a cap of €300,000 (£255,000)”.   Whilst the new regulations will apparently incorporate an allowance which reflects the farm’s wages bill, which is welcome news and should mean that both larger and smaller farms are treated equally, there will be a discrimination for those using external contractors

 

Who's online

We have 66 guests online

Supported by

Banner

...and...

Banner

...and...

Banner
Home Land & politics Concerns over Flood & Water Management Bill
Concerns over Flood & Water Management Bill PDF Print E-mail
Written by Alistair Macgregor   
Thursday, 26 November 2009 10:23

Recent flooding in Cumbria

The NFU has raised a number of concerns with the Government's Flood & Water Management Bill which has now been presented to Parliament.

Among the areas for concern is the new role and responsibilities for flood risk management, in particular the strategic overview role given to the Environment Agency and the new arrangements for reservoir safety, extending the scope of the current Reservoirs Act 1975 to include reservoirs of 10,000 cubic metres capacity or more.

The Bill, criticised by the influential Efra Select Committee, follows Sir Michael Pitt's review of the floods of 2007, which saw floodwaters overwhelm urban and rural communities alike and cause untold damage to farming businesses.

Nine key provisions are contained within the Bill with four directly affecting the farming industry:

  • The National Flood & Coastal Risk Management Strategy: associated roles and responsibilities
  • Local Authorities responsibility for local Flood & Coastal Risk Management Strategies
  • Update of the Reservoir Safety legislation
  • The application of the 'sustainability duty' to all bodies managing flood risk

NFU deputy president Meurig Raymond says: "Although the Bill reflects many of the recommendations of the Pitt review, there are a number of concerns for the farming industry including the role of the Environmental Agency. The NFU appreciates the need for a single, coordinating body to be responsible for all types of flooding, and understands the reasons for the EA being given this role. However, we consider that the Bill's provisions are power heavy and duty light, both in terms of the Agency's strategic overview role and its operational activity.

"We believe there is a strong sense of disconnection between the EA and those on the ground who are affected by flooding and that there has been inadequate investment in the maintenance of rivers and defences. It is imperative that the EA publishes its maintenance schedules and risk assessments used in determining its approach.

"It is also vital to ensure that new clauses on reservoir safety are not used in the future to enable unnecessary additional costs and bureaucracy to be placed on the farming sector. That could have a direct impact on small on-farm reservoirs which are an important tool for helping farmers and growers to use water more efficiently."

The NFU, however, applauds the aims of the Bill to provide better, more sustainable management of flood risk for people, homes and businesses; help safeguard community groups from unaffordable rises in surface water drainage charges; and protect water supplies to the consumer. It agrees with:

  • the need for a comprehensive national flood and coastal risk management strategy
  • that local people need to have a greater influence in shaping local flood and coastal erosion risk management strategies
  • that all authorities involved in flood and coastal erosion risk management should have due regard to sustainable development where possible
 
Please register or login to add your comments to this article.
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack